🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently after viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced favorable results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."